Justice, First Court of Appeals · First Court of Appeals, Place 6 · Republican

13 public receipts · reviewed Aug 11, 2026

Public record

Andrew Johnson

First Court of Appeals District, Texas

Andrew Johnson serves as Justice, First Court of Appeals, Place 6. The official court biography states: You are using an outdated browser. Please upgrade your browser or activate Google Chrome Frame to improve your experience. RepWatchr treats opinions, orders, case records, and oral arguments as the role-compatible accountability record; legislative roll calls are not substituted for judicial work.

Follow profile

Overall grade

Not rated

Role-specific method pending

Judicial record: Role-specific; Applicable judicial record is not loaded
Profile depth: 71%; Buildout continues
Public receipts: 13; Unique linked sources

Official Texas Judicial Branch portrait.

Performance grade

Not rated

Role-specific method pending

A legislator formula is not reused

RepWatchr has not published a comparable scoring method for this office family. The profile can show sourced records without forcing them into the wrong grade.

Read the grading method

Confidence and evidence

How complete is the research file?

Completeness is not performance.

Evidence coverageWeighted share of the grade framework supported by reviewed inputs.: Pending
ConfidenceSource quality, freshness, reliability, and coverage—not certainty about the official.: Not established
Grade weight clearedOnly categories that pass publication gates can contribute to a score.: Pending

Applicable recorded decisions

Applicable judicial record is not loaded

Pending

Roll-call voting is not the right measure for this office. A role-specific review of opinions, recusals, reversals, discipline, and administrative duties is still pending.

RepWatchr will use judicial decisions and administrative record; missing material is not scored as misconduct.

Verified public sentiment

No verified sentiment result is published

Pending

No qualifying sample has been supplied. Missing community responses do not raise or lower the performance grade.

Identity, geography, duplicate-account, and sample-size checks must pass before publication.

Reviewed reports

Read the favorable record and the scrutiny side by side.

Tone appears only after person-level editorial review. A flag identifies a documented matter to inspect; it is not automatically a finding of wrongdoing.

Critical reports and verified flags

No reviewed critical item is published in this file yet. That means the review is incomplete—not that the record is clean.

Favorable coverage

No reviewed favorable item is published in this file yet. Missing coverage is not evidence that the official has no accomplishments.

Office: State; First Court of Appeals District, Texas
Current term: Jan 1, 2025 – Dec 31, 2030; First Court of Appeals, Place 6 · Next: 2030 general election
Judicial record: Role-specific; Applicable judicial record is not loaded
Public receipts: 13; Profile reviewed Aug 11, 2026

Applicable judicial record is not loaded

Roll-call voting is not the right measure for this office. A role-specific review of opinions, recusals, reversals, discipline, and administrative duties is still pending.

Applicable judicial record is not loaded

Roll-call voting is not the right measure for this office. A role-specific review of opinions, recusals, reversals, discipline, and administrative duties is still pending.

How judicial decisions and administrative record will appear

New entries will appear only after a role-compatible source is loaded and reviewed. A blank ledger is not a clean-record finding and does not lower the grade.

Verified public sentiment

Results publish only after identity, geography, duplicate-account, anomaly-review, and minimum-sample checks. Community opinion never changes the performance grade.

Community scorecard paused

This beta will reopen after secure verification and reproducible aggregate checks are in place.

Coverage, separated by what it actually says

Positive and critical labels require an explicit person-level editorial classification. Party, office, headline mood, and social popularity are never used as shortcuts.

Positive coverage

No approved article has been classified as positive coverage for this person yet. That is an unfilled file, not proof there is no good news.

Critical coverage and records

No approved critical item is loaded. That is not a clean-record finding; it means this file still needs reviewed sources.

Related reporting without a positive or critical label

0 reviewed articles

No source-linked, editorially approved related reporting is loaded yet.

Official links, public receipts, and the missing record

A complete-looking profile can still have evidence gaps. RepWatchr shows both the usable links and the work that remains.

Official channelsWebsite ↗Social accounts not loaded

Source desk

Showing 8 of 13

01OfficialOfficial websiteOpen ↗
02OfficialOfficial First Court rosterOpen ↗
03OfficialOfficial First Court contact pageOpen ↗
04OfficialOfficial First Court case searchOpen ↗
05OfficialOfficial First Court document searchOpen ↗
06OfficialOfficial First Court orders and opinionsOpen ↗
07OfficialOfficial First Court oral-argument pathOpen ↗
08OfficialTexas Judicial Branch courts-of-appeals overviewOpen ↗

Ask, answer, correct, and add a source

Comments are the public conversation. They do not change the evidence grade unless a claim is reviewed against a public record.

Missing source

Share the receipt, not just the outrage.

Source-backed snippet

Missing source check: Andrew Johnson public record. If there is a better public record, add it so this page can be corrected or upgraded. https://www.repwatchr.com/officials/tx-coa-1-place-6-andrew-johnson

Before the meeting

Before the meeting: open Andrew Johnson, name the public source, ask what record answers the question, and request the missing link be posted for voters.

Ask this public question

Can you point voters to the public record, vote, filing, agenda, or source link that supports your position on Andrew Johnson? Current source trail: 13 public receipts and the currently labeled evidence gaps.

Public Discussion

0 comments

Community rules: lawful disagreement stays visible, sourced comments rank higher, and threats, doxxing, spam, or unlawful harassment are removed.

Join the conversation about Andrew Johnson

or use email