State Representative · HD-95 · Democrat
26 public receipts · reviewed Aug 14, 2026
Public record
Nicole Collier
Texas House of Representatives
Nicole Collier represents House District 95 in the Texas House of Representatives. The current official House profile lists service on Appropriations, Appropriations - S/C on Articles VI, VII, & VIII, Public Health.
Overall grade
Not rated
0% of grade weight cleared
- Roll calls
- 4,507
- Through Jun 21, 2026
- Recorded positions
- 96.0%
- 4,326 yea, nay, or present
- Public receipts
- 26
- Unique linked sources
Accountability snapshot
What the public record supports.
Grade, evidence, decisions, sentiment, favorable coverage, and scrutiny stay separate. One headline or a missing source cannot silently become Nicole Collier’s score.
Performance grade
Not rated
Evidence gate not cleared
No zero or placeholder grade is assigned
The record has not cleared RepWatchr's minimum evidence gate for a defensible overall grade.
Read the grading methodConfidence and evidence
How complete is the research file?
Completeness is not performance.
- Evidence coverageWeighted share of the grade framework supported by reviewed inputs.
- 0%
- ConfidenceSource quality, freshness, reliability, and coverage—not certainty about the official.
- Not established
- Grade weight clearedOnly categories that pass publication gates can contribute to a score.
- 0%
Applicable recorded decisions
Yea or nay positions in the indexed file
4,301
4,507 total roll-call positions are loaded for Texas Legislature records from 2025-01-14 through 2026-06-21. Present, not-voting, and other rows remain visible but are not recast as substantive decisions.
- Yea
- 3,545
- Nay
- 756
- Present
- 25
- Not voting / other
- 181
Official record through Jun 21, 2026. Eligibility and excused-status review remain separate.
Verified public sentiment
No verified sentiment result is published
Pending
No qualifying sample has been supplied. Missing community responses do not raise or lower the performance grade.
Identity, geography, duplicate-account, and sample-size checks must pass before publication.
Reviewed reports
Read the favorable record and the scrutiny side by side.
Tone appears only after person-level editorial review. A flag identifies a documented matter to inspect; it is not automatically a finding of wrongdoing.
Critical reports and verified flags
0No reviewed critical item is published in this file yet. That means the review is incomplete—not that the record is clean.
Favorable coverage
0No reviewed favorable item is published in this file yet. Missing coverage is not evidence that the official has no accomplishments.
- Office
- State
- Texas House of Representatives
- Current term
- Jan 8, 2013 – Dec 31, 2026
- HD-95 · Next: 2026 general election
- Roll calls
- 4,507
- Official record through Jun 21, 2026
- Public receipts
- 26
- Profile reviewed Aug 14, 2026
What the recorded decisions show
This chart counts recorded positions. It does not decide whether a yea or nay was good, bad, conservative, or liberal.
4,507
indexed votes · Texas Legislature records from 2025-01-14 through 2026-06-21
- Yea
- 3,545 · 78.7%
- Nay
- 756 · 16.8%
- Present
- 25 · 0.6%
- Not voting / other
- 181 · 4.0%
Latest recorded decisions
Browse votes →- Sep 3, 2025HB 1Roll 166 · official record ↗Yea
- Sep 3, 2025HB 20Roll 165 · official record ↗Yea
- Sep 3, 2025SB 1Roll 164 · official record ↗Yea
- Sep 3, 2025HR 128Roll 162 · official record ↗Nay
- Sep 3, 2025SB 5Roll 161 · official record ↗Yea
Verified public sentiment
Results publish only after identity, geography, duplicate-account, anomaly-review, and minimum-sample checks. Community opinion never changes the performance grade.
Community scorecard paused
This beta will reopen after secure verification and reproducible aggregate checks are in place.
Coverage, separated by what it actually says
Positive and critical labels require an explicit person-level editorial classification. Party, office, headline mood, and social popularity are never used as shortcuts.
Positive coverage
0No approved article has been classified as positive coverage for this person yet. That is an unfilled file, not proof there is no good news.
Critical coverage and records
0No approved critical item is loaded. That is not a clean-record finding; it means this file still needs reviewed sources.
Related reporting without a positive or critical label
0 reviewed articlesNo source-linked, editorially approved related reporting is loaded yet.
Official links, public receipts, and the missing record
A complete-looking profile can still have evidence gaps. RepWatchr shows both the usable links and the work that remains.
Source desk
Showing 8 of 26- 01OfficialOfficial websiteOpen ↗
- 02OfficialOfficial current Texas House roster APIOpen ↗
- 03OfficialOfficial Texas House member directoryOpen ↗
- 04OfficialOfficial Texas House biographyOpen ↗
- 05OfficialOfficial Texas House committee assignmentsOpen ↗
- 06OfficialTexas Legislature Online authored billsOpen ↗
- 07OfficialTexas Legislature Online sponsored billsOpen ↗
- 08OfficialTexas Legislature Online vote-information guideOpen ↗
Ask, answer, correct, and add a source
Comments are the public conversation. They do not change the evidence grade unless a claim is reviewed against a public record.
Missing source
Share the receipt, not just the outrage.
Source-backed snippet
Missing source check: Nicole Collier public record. If there is a better public record, add it so this page can be corrected or upgraded. https://www.repwatchr.com/officials/nicole-collier
Before the meeting
Before the meeting: open Nicole Collier, name the public source, ask what record answers the question, and request the missing link be posted for voters.
Ask this public question
Can you point voters to the public record, vote, filing, agenda, or source link that supports your position on Nicole Collier? Current source trail: 26 public receipts and the currently labeled evidence gaps.
Public Discussion
0 commentsJoin the conversation about Nicole Collier
Sign in with a social profile or email. Verification and moderation rules still apply.