State Senator · SD-30 · Republican
27 public receipts · reviewed Aug 13, 2026
Public record
Brent Hagenbuch
Texas Senate
Brent Hagenbuch currently represents Texas Senate District 30. The official Senate roster and member page verify the assignment and list Veteran Affairs, Select — Chair, Administration — Vice-Chair, Higher Education — Vice-Chair, and additional committees. RepWatchr links the official bill-author report, vote guide, and Senate journal; findings publish only after record-level review.
Overall grade
Not rated
0% of grade weight cleared
- Roll calls
- 3,281
- Through Jun 21, 2026
- Recorded positions
- 99.9%
- 3,279 yea, nay, or present
- Public receipts
- 27
- Unique linked sources

Accountability snapshot
What the public record supports.
Grade, evidence, decisions, sentiment, favorable coverage, and scrutiny stay separate. One headline or a missing source cannot silently become Brent Hagenbuch’s score.
Performance grade
Not rated
Evidence gate not cleared
No zero or placeholder grade is assigned
The record has not cleared RepWatchr's minimum evidence gate for a defensible overall grade.
Read the grading methodConfidence and evidence
How complete is the research file?
Completeness is not performance.
- Evidence coverageWeighted share of the grade framework supported by reviewed inputs.
- 0%
- ConfidenceSource quality, freshness, reliability, and coverage—not certainty about the official.
- Not established
- Grade weight clearedOnly categories that pass publication gates can contribute to a score.
- 0%
Applicable recorded decisions
Yea or nay positions in the indexed file
3,279
3,281 total roll-call positions are loaded for Texas Senate Journal records from 2025-01-14 through 2026-06-21. Present, not-voting, and other rows remain visible but are not recast as substantive decisions.
- Yea
- 2,876
- Nay
- 403
- Present
- 0
- Not voting / other
- 2
Official record through Jun 21, 2026. Eligibility and excused-status review remain separate.
Verified public sentiment
No verified sentiment result is published
Pending
No qualifying sample has been supplied. Missing community responses do not raise or lower the performance grade.
Identity, geography, duplicate-account, and sample-size checks must pass before publication.
Reviewed reports
Read the favorable record and the scrutiny side by side.
Tone appears only after person-level editorial review. A flag identifies a documented matter to inspect; it is not automatically a finding of wrongdoing.
Critical reports and verified flags
0No reviewed critical item is published in this file yet. That means the review is incomplete—not that the record is clean.
Favorable coverage
0No reviewed favorable item is published in this file yet. Missing coverage is not evidence that the official has no accomplishments.
- Office
- State
- Texas Senate
- Current term
- Jan 14, 2025 – Dec 31, 2028
- SD-30 · Next: 2028 general election
- Roll calls
- 3,281
- Official record through Jun 21, 2026
- Public receipts
- 27
- Profile reviewed Aug 13, 2026
What the recorded decisions show
This chart counts recorded positions. It does not decide whether a yea or nay was good, bad, conservative, or liberal.
3,281
indexed votes · Texas Senate Journal records from 2025-01-14 through 2026-06-21
- Yea
- 2,876 · 87.7%
- Nay
- 403 · 12.3%
- Present
- 0 · 0.0%
- Not voting / other
- 2 · 0.1%
Latest recorded decisions
Browse votes →- Sep 4, 2025HB18 Senate record voteRoll 342 · official record ↗Yea
- Sep 4, 2025SR5 Senate record voteRoll 15 · official record ↗Yea
- Sep 4, 2025SR2 Senate record voteRoll 15 · official record ↗Yea
- Sep 3, 2025SB8 Senate record voteRoll 466 · official record ↗Yea
- Sep 3, 2025SB5 Senate record voteRoll 367 · official record ↗Yea
Verified public sentiment
Results publish only after identity, geography, duplicate-account, anomaly-review, and minimum-sample checks. Community opinion never changes the performance grade.
Community scorecard paused
This beta will reopen after secure verification and reproducible aggregate checks are in place.
Coverage, separated by what it actually says
Positive and critical labels require an explicit person-level editorial classification. Party, office, headline mood, and social popularity are never used as shortcuts.
Positive coverage
0No approved article has been classified as positive coverage for this person yet. That is an unfilled file, not proof there is no good news.
Critical coverage and records
0No approved critical item is loaded. That is not a clean-record finding; it means this file still needs reviewed sources.
Related reporting without a positive or critical label
0 reviewed articlesNo source-linked, editorially approved related reporting is loaded yet.
Official links, public receipts, and the missing record
A complete-looking profile can still have evidence gaps. RepWatchr shows both the usable links and the work that remains.
Source desk
Showing 8 of 27- 01OfficialOfficial websiteOpen ↗
- 02OfficialOfficial current Texas Senate rosterOpen ↗
- 03OfficialOfficial Texas Senate directoryOpen ↗
- 04OfficialOfficial 89th Legislature committee directoryOpen ↗
- 05OfficialTexas Legislature Online bills by authorOpen ↗
- 06OfficialTexas Legislature Online vote-information guideOpen ↗
- 07OfficialOfficial Texas Senate journalOpen ↗
- 08OfficialTexas Ethics Commission campaign-finance searchOpen ↗
Ask, answer, correct, and add a source
Comments are the public conversation. They do not change the evidence grade unless a claim is reviewed against a public record.
Missing source
Share the receipt, not just the outrage.
Source-backed snippet
Missing source check: Brent Hagenbuch public record. If there is a better public record, add it so this page can be corrected or upgraded. https://www.repwatchr.com/officials/brent-hagenbuch
Before the meeting
Before the meeting: open Brent Hagenbuch, name the public source, ask what record answers the question, and request the missing link be posted for voters.
Ask this public question
Can you point voters to the public record, vote, filing, agenda, or source link that supports your position on Brent Hagenbuch? Current source trail: 27 public receipts and the currently labeled evidence gaps.
Public Discussion
0 commentsJoin the conversation about Brent Hagenbuch
Sign in with a social profile or email. Verification and moderation rules still apply.
